A forum member was at the Cirkus gig in Stockholm and critised the (low) sound levels and the sound quality and the set list. Jocke replies:
Complain to Socialstyrelsen (the board of health) if you didn't like the sound levels.
You MUST not play louder than 100 decibels during a concert and it counts as a cut through the gig.
Which means in reality that you often have a little lower volume on some songs and can press stronger on others.
Otherwise the artist/ organisers will get a fine.
Up to 50000 (Swedish kr, I assume) I have heard from fairly reliable sources that you get fined for excessive sound levels.
The fine amounts are not fixed and can have large differences between council municipalities.
But I also know that some foreign artists (My Bloody... for example) have demanded a higher sound level whereupon the organisers have probably 'counted in' fines in the fee.
You can pay the fines for us if you want, so we can play louder.
Why can't anyone find out the facts before you diss?
In a large part of Europe (and in Denmark) you have a limit of 103 decibels which makes a sustantial difference.*
Now SS (Socialstyrelsen) wants to lower the level to 97.
Since an acoustic umaplified drumset (and a human voice) can easily be over 100db, this is ridiculous.
Of course you must have a sound level at concerts but if the crowd chat easily drowns out the noise from the stage then something is wrong.
* Upping the level by 3 db isn't just like going up 3%, there's a ratio thing going on (and my memory can't quite remember the physics/ maths of it) but 3 more/less decibels is quite a lot in ratio terms compaired to 100db. Roughly the same thing is at work on the Richter scale, and an earthquake at 6 is much stronger than an earthquake at 5. Something like double the intensity. Try and read the wiki page on it and see if you can understand it!!!