In my opinion, Kent would be considered 'satanic' if their music actually influenced listeners to think and be drawn to satanic thoughts/practices. I still just feel really happy when I listen to Kent, so I don't consider their music satanic, although I really dislike the Töntarna video (but I blame the director, unless the concept came from Kent themselves).
Secondly, if I may hypothesize, perhaps Kent are interested in freemasonry. And I am not really sure if freemasonry is considered satanic. But like what FCKeane said, A LOT of western musicians (prime example being JAY-Z, Kanye West, etc.) are into freemasonry/illuminati or whatever the hell it is called. They always do the freemasonry handshakes and pose in pictures looking retarded making the stupid pyramid sign:
http://img150.imageshack.us/i/71300614xf9.jpg/
http://levantateyanda.files.wordpres...i-handsign.jpg
And these people always happen to be: successful. But whatever, good for them.
Going back to Kent, I guess it does bother me that a lot of satanic/freemasonry signs are displayed in the Töntarna video (open palm with an eye, pentagram with an eye in the centre, cross with curved top part, etc), regardless of whether it was all coincidence or it was actually intentional... it's there, is what it is. I especially don't like the fact that the director used KIDS WITH SPECIAL NEEDS for the video, as chances are, they have no idea what any of those symbols in the video mean, and would not have objected to being part of the video.
Thankfully, I don't really like this song to begin with, so I just won't watch that video again or listen to that song much. If you like the video and like the song, then that works out for you! Now, if Kent used this video to some of my fav. kent songs (sad/pretty ones like Det Kanske Kommer En Förändring/Välgärningar Och Illdåd/Nålens Öga/Glider, etc.), I would have been upset, but then they didn't.
